miercuri, 18 iulie 2012

Raportul de tara iulie 2012 (episodul 1): Ce se intampla cu banii obtinuti din coruptie?

Punctele de vedere exprimate în acest articol sunt opinii personale si nu reprezintă pozitii oficiale ale instituțiilor publice sau private cu care autorul are relații contractuale.

 Haideti sa citim raportul tehnic (in engleza). Si sa vedem, pentru inceput ce se intampla cu banii din coruptie.

1. Prejudiciile din coruptie nu sunt recuperate (personajele sunt condamnate la inchisoare dar raman cu banii). Anul trecut s-au confiscat pe hartie din coruptie 320,000 Euro dar nu se stie daca ANAF a si vazut banii la fata!!! 

"Dissuasiveness of judicial action also relies on the effective pursuit, seizure and confiscation of criminal assets. During 2008-2011, DNA estimated damages of €1.13 billion in cases that reached the courts. The prosecutors seized during the reference period assets worth €532 million. In 2011, DNA issued seizure orders for assets worth €212 million and effectively seized €167 million. In the same year, the courts ordered convicted defendants to pay €33.3 million in damages to public authorities and state owned companies. €14.7 million was voluntarily returned by defendants during investigations or trials, whilst a further €1.9 million have been returned to the bribe givers who denounced the bribery act.114 However aside from these compensations to civil parties, in corruption case the courts ordered the confiscation of just €320,000. Furthermore, no information is available on the amounts actually recovered by the fiscal authorities. Overall, the track record on asset recovery in the courts appears to fall short of expectations."

2. Daca iti transferi banii din coruptie pe numele altuia (ruda sau prieten), statul nu are ce sa iti faca (si nici in viitor nu pare a avea) 

"Third-party confiscation remains problematic and with no common vision of practitioners of how to deal with it. The Constitutional provision according to which the licit origin of property is presumed further contributes to a non-unitary practice and cautious approach towards other forms of confiscation. Whilst ANI can assist, and has assisted DNA to pursue unjustified wealth of public officials, ANI cannot follow assets transferred to third parties, nor independently freeze assets."

3. Chiar si pe hartie se confisca foarte putina avere nejustificata, pentru ca de vazut banii nici nu se pune problema. 

"The Courts have confirmed the existence of unjustified wealth in just four cases. In addition, whilst they had ordered the confiscation of assets totalling 1.1 million EUR in these cases, it is not yet clear whether these confiscation orders have been enforced".

Din episoadele urmatoare: (in)existenta avertizorilor de integritate, (in)eficacitate sistemului de sanctionare disciplinara, (inutila) sactionare penala a conflictului de interese, (i)relevanta consilierii de etica etc

Niciun comentariu: